Answer by Andy McIntosh
The accusation that there are no peer reviewed papers supportive of design / creation is a totally false claim. I refer you to one in particular which caused an absolute furore in certain scientific circles when it was accepted. But it was published. See ‘Meyer, S.C., The origin of biological information and the higher taxonomic categories. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 117(2), pp. 213–239, 2004. This was followed by Abel, D.L. & Trevors, J.T., Three subsets of sequence complexity and their relevance to biopolymeric information. Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling, 2, p. 29, 2005.
And there are more from this group such as Abel, D.L., The capabilities of chaos and complexity. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 10, pp. 247–291, 2009. I myself also have several papers on this subject published 2009 in the Int. J. of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics. i.e. “Evidence of design in bird feathers and avian respiration. A.C. McIntosh, Int. J. of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics. Vol. 4, No. 2 (2009) 154–169 . Also another paper in the same journal A.C. McIntosh ‘Information and entropy – top – down or bottom-up development in living systems?’ Int. J. of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics. Vol. 4, No. 4 (2009) 351–385.
There are peer reviewed papers supportive of design and creation out there. It is just that folk have not looked, perhaps do not know where to look, or sadly don’t want to look.
Were you helped by this answer? If so, consider making a donation so we can keep adding more answers. Donate here.