Is “fossil DNA” an observation or an interpretation of the facts?

Is “fossil DNA” an observation or an interpretation of the facts?
Is this a whale of a tale? What genes do we really have?
Is it science versus religion, or religion versus religion?
Are they feathers? Are they dinosaurs?
This hard hairless area is claimed to be a vestigial footpad, but there is no evidence for this.
More genetic information is not necessarily better information. Why?
What’s it for? Our Medical Biologist Dr Diane Eager tells us.
Answer by Dr Ed Neeland who is a published scientist and chemistry professor at U.B.C. (Hons B.Sc. Double Major Biology/Chemistry, M.Sc. Organic Chemistry, Ph.D. Organic Chemistry, Postdoc Botany).