The original question was:
If you can show me just one error Professor Dawkins has made, I may be impressed with your pathetic attempts to establish creation!

Answer by John Mackay and Diane Eager

You have asked for only one error, but we will be generous and provide two.

One: The Vertebrate Eye

In his book The Greatest Show on Earth Dawkins asserts that the retina, the light sensitive layer in the back of the eye, is “back to front”.  He then goes on to explain: “… suppose I tell you that the eye’s photocells are pointing backwards, away from the scene being looked at.  The “wires” connecting the photocells to the brain run all over the surface of the retina, so the light has to pass through a carpet of massed wires before they hit the photocells.”  He goes on to conclude. “Once again, send it back, is not just bad design, it’s the design of a complete idiot.”
Richard Dawkins, (2009) The Greatest Show on Earth, Bantam Press, pp353-354.

RetinaTo help understand this criticism, we need to look at the organisation of cells in the retina. The retina has three layers of cells: one layer of photoreceptor cells that capture light and convert it to electrical signals, and two layers of nerve cells that begin the processing of the image and send the information to the brain.  In between these layers there is a mass of nerve fibres that connect these cells to one another and convey the information to the brain.  As Dawkins correctly points out, the light sensitive cells are at the back, with the photoreceptor part of the cell furthest from the incoming light, as seen this photo of the cell layers in the retina.  This apparent anomaly has been called the “inverted retina,” and has been used to pour scorn on creationists for many years.

In spite of this apparent anomaly scientists have known for a long time that the photoreceptors benefitted from being at the back of the retina in order to be properly maintained by a layer of cells immediately behind the retina. (See the row of speckled brown cells in the row behind the photoreceptor layer in the photo above)  They also admitted that the retina does work even though it looks odd.

Now, when you see something that looks odd, but functions well, the scientific approach is not to write it off as bad design, but to do some more research as find out how it works. This has now been done.

In 2007 an interdisciplinary group of scientists published a study of Müller cells, elongated cells that extend through all the layers of the retina, from the front to photoreceptor layer. Franze’s team found that Muller cells collect light and convey it to the layer containing the photocells.  Their findings are well summed up in the title of their report: “Müller cells are living optical fibers in the vertebrate retina”.  (Franze, K. et. al. (2007) Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol 104, pp 8287–8292, doi: 10.1073/pnas.0611180104, published 15 May 2007.)

This discovery means that light does not have to randomly find its way through a tangle of nerve cells and fibres to get to the photocells, but is conveyed through the retina with minimum distortion.

Note this discovery was published in 2007, i.e. two years before Dawkins’ book was published, in a prestigious scientific journal available to anyone.

Further research on these cells has revealed how incredibly efficient they are as light conductors, as they not only convey light, but they correct a problem that occurs when white light is refracted by the lens at the front of eye.

White light is actually a mix of all the colours of the rainbow. The different colours are different wavelengths of light, and when these are passed through a lens they are refracted (bent) at slightly different angles.  These means that blue light and red light from the same source are separated as they pass through the eye by a tiny amount, but it is enough to blur the image on the retina.  However, Muller cells have funnel shaped ends and can collect both the blue and red light from the same source, and recombine them as the light is conveyed through the Muller cell to the photoreceptor layer.  This means light from the same source is conveyed to the same place in the photoreceptor layer, resulting in a sharp image.

The scientists who carried out this research reported: “The retina is revealed as an optimal structure designed for improving the sharpness of images.” (Labin, A. M. and Ribak, E. N., (2010) Physical Review Letters, vol.104, p158102. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.158102, published 16 April 2010)

An optimal structure is not the blundering mistake of a “complete idiot”, it is the superb design of a brilliant Creator.

Two: The Koala Pouch

In the same book as his scathing comments about the eye, Dawkins also asserts the pouch of a mother koala “opens downwards, instead of upwards as in a kangaroo.” According to Dawkins this is “not a good idea in an animal that spends its time clinging to tree trunks.” Richard Dawkins, (2009) The Greatest Show on Earth, Bantam Press, pp369-370

If Dawkins had consulted the Australian Koala Foundation he would have found the following description of the koala pouch:

“Female Koalas have been described as having a ‘backward-opening’ pouch, in common with wombats and in contrast to an upward-opening pouch like kangaroos. However, that’s not strictly true. When a female Koala first gives birth to young her pouch opening faces neither up nor down, although it is located towards the bottom of the pouch rather than at the top. It faces straight outwards rather than ‘backwards’. It sometimes appears to be ‘backward-facing’ because when the joey is older and leans out of the pouch, this pulls the pouch downwards or ‘backwards’. The pouch has a strong sphincter muscle at the opening to prevent the joey from falling out.” Australian Kola Foundation, Physical Characteristics of the Koala, https://www.savethekoala.com/about-koalas/physical-characteristics-koala

The belief that the Koala pouch opens downwards comes from observations of joeys (baby koalas) facing downwards when they first start to peer out of the pouch. This is because of an important stage in development of the baby.  While it lives in the pouch the baby koala feeds on milk from its mother, like any other mammal, but before it can live independently it has to learn to eat eucalyptus leaves, and its intestines have to be able to digest them.  When the joey is about 6 months old the mother starts producing a substance called “pap” in her droppings.  This consists of pre-digested eucalyptus leaves mixed with gut microbes that help with digestion.  The joey feeds on the pap in order to prepare its digestive system for a diet of leaves after it leaves the pouch.  In order to get to the pap the baby has to lean downwards.

One of the authors (John Mackay) has koalas living in trees on his property, and has never known a koala mother to lose her baby from falling out of the pouch. (Drop bears are definitely a myth in Australia)


Dawkins definitely fails on these two examples.

However, that is not his real problem, nor we suspect, the problem of the questioner. The real problem is deliberately hiding behind a false theory instead of being prepared to face Christ the Creator, who will judge Dawkins for calling him “a complete idiot”, but has died and risen in order to give Dawkins and anyone else new life if they repent.

Were you helped by this answer? If so, consider making a donation so we can keep adding more answers. Donate here.

About The Contributor