Answer by Nigel Currie
Here is a summary of Nigel’s article. For full article use the download link below.
Climate change/global warming has occupied considerable public and scientific attention over much of the last two decades. An apparent majority of scientists, politicians, environmentalist lobbyists and the public have deemed greenhouse gases, and especially carbon dioxide, as polluters responsible for plunging planet earth into a climate crisis with dire consequences. The verdict has already been handed down even though the trial is still in progress. All that remains is for the evidence to be selectively collected to vindicate the verdict and justify the concern and considerable expense in saving the planet. The problem is that the broader body of evidence does not support the verdict. The strength and weakness of science lies in its ability to use data to make predictions. Faulty data that omits or undervalues the contribution of water leads to fundamentally flawed climate change modelling and a retrial is demanded.
For more details on greenhouse gases and the significance of water vapour and carbon dioxide download PDF article:.
More references on this topic
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/13/6/849/htm
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2012GL051106
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/200471681_On_the_Credibility_of_Climate_Predictions
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1623/hysj.48.1.3.43481
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/200471681_On_the_Credibility_of_Climate_Predictions
Were you helped by this answer? If so, consider making a donation so we can keep adding more answers. Donate here.
